Welcome to the Criminal Procedure Act 2009


The Criminal Procedure Act 2009 has been in operation for a few years now. While there continues to be interpretation and amendment of its provisions, the transition from the old legislation to the new has successfully been made, and a blog exclusively dedicated to the Act is no longer necessary.

If you're looking for a frequently updated blog on general legal matters in Victoria, have a look at Quis Custodes Ipsos Custodes? by the same authors.















2010-01-23

350. Determination of application for leave during sentencing hearing

350. Determination of application for leave during sentencing hearing

In the course of a sentencing hearing, the court must not grant leave under section 342 unless it is satisfied that the evidence has substantial relevance to the issue of appropriate sentence and the offender—

(a) has pleaded guilty to all sexual offences charged against the offender; or

(b) has been found guilty of all sexual offences charged against the offender.

Note

Section 352 limits the relevance of sexual history evidence.

Section 350 sets out how the court must determine an application for leave in a sentencing hearing. This section is based on (now repealed) Rule (3)(b) in section 37A(1) of the (now amended) Evidence Act 1958.

Uncertainty surrounds why an accused must plead or be found guilty to all charges before such evidence becomes admissible. Strictly read, this could deny an accused who has successfully defended some charges from informing the court of surrounding mitigatory circumstances.

0 comments:

Related Articles


Related Article Widget by Hoctro

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP